Reducing weight and increasing performance are two of the most important factors in pushing standalone XR headsets forward. While Meta has shown off its own Orion AR glasses prototype using a wireless compute unit, Meta’s CTO Andrew Bosworth doesn’t think a similar setup is the magic bullet for standalone VR gaming.
Bosworth, who is also head of the company’s Reality Labs XR team, held another one of his Instagram Q&As earlier this week, where he typically delves into a wide variety of topics—some professional, some personal.
In the latest session, Bosworth expounded on the subject of wireless compute units, and how the company thinks they aren’t the right fit for its standalone VR headsets.
Meta Quest 3S | Image courtesy Meta
“We have looked at this a bunch of times. Wireless compute pucks just really don’t solve the problem. If you’re wireless, they still have a battery on the headset, which is a major driver of weight. And, sure, you’re gaining some thermal space so your performance could potentially be better, although you’re somewhat limited now by bandwidth because you’re using a radio,” Bosworth says.
Technical hurdles aside, Meta is primarily focused on building something accessible to consumers, with its latest Quest 3S selling for as low as $300 for the 128GB version. Bosworth continues:
“You’ve increased your cost dramatically, because even if your major silicon is in the wireless compute puck, you still need quite a bit of silicon to just power the displays and do the local corrections required there, and handle the stream of data. So it really ends up … the math doesn’t work, is what I’m saying. And it doesn’t end up saving you that much weight and dramatically increases your cost and complexity.”
Meta’s Orion AR Glasses Prototype | Image courtesy Meta
This comes in contrast to Meta’s Orion prototype, which does incorporate a wireless compute unit. Granted, Orion isn’t going to be productized due to its enormous cost—a reported $10,000 per-unit owing to its difficult-to-produce silicon carbide lenses, however it’s clear that in some cases wireless pucks do make sense—namely in delivering less immersive graphics to AR glasses.
Then again, Bosworth has said its first pair of AR glasses for consumers won’t hit at that Quest price-point when they land at some point in the future. Bosworth said back in September that such a device is “not going to be cheap,” noting however the company aims to make them accessible “at least in the space of phone, laptop territory.”
COLD VR, a spiritual successor to long-time hit SUPERHOT VR (2016), is officially headed to Quest and PC VR headsets next month, with its PSVR 2 version slated to arrive later.
Superhot VR is old, but gold. And it’s a wonder more studios haven’t tried to replicate its game’s unique time-stopping movement mechanic.
Cold VR has to a certain extent, although it’s flipping the script by making you move not slower, but faster. In Cold VR, when you slow down, time goes faster, and so does the relentless enemy AI. Take too long to think out your strategy, and you’re toast.
1 of 3
Image courtesy ALLWARE LLC, Perp Games
Image courtesy ALLWARE LLC, Perp Games
Image courtesy ALLWARE LLC, Perp Games
Now developer ALLWARE announced in a new trailer that they’ve teamed up with publisher Perp Games to release Cold VR on Quest and PC VR headsets, launching on January 21st, 2025. The PSVR 2 release is set to arrive “at a later date,” the studios say.
To boot, the game promises “increasingly powerful enemy AI but also environmental hazards such as deadly lasers, moving platforms, and unexpected surprises for those daring enough to explore,” ALLWARE says.
“Developing COLD VR has been an incredible journey. With the amazing support from Perp Games, I’m thrilled to introduce players to a truly unique experience where time itself becomes a gameplay mechanic,” ALLWARE’s Carlos Alfonso says. “Their help has been invaluable in bringing the game to more people than I ever imagined. Thanks to Perp, COLD VR will be available on PSVR2 and Quest, making this dream a reality for a wider audience. I couldn’t be more excited for what’s ahead!”
You can wishlist Cold VR on all platforms today, where it will be priced at $19.99 / £14.99 / €19.99. You’ll find it over on the Horizon Store for Quest 2/3/Pro, Steam for PC VR headsets and the PlayStation Store for PSVR 2.
Alien: Rogue Incursion releases today on PSVR 2 and PC VR headsets, while the Quest version of the the Xenomorph-flavored horror-shooter is slated to arrive February next year. Now developer Survios announced its already in full swing crafting ‘Part Two’.
We’ve already had a chance to play through Part One in our full review, where we gave the game a solid [7/10] for its immersive atmosphere and strong narrative, which we thought was somewhat dampened by repetitive enemy encounters and a pretty punishing save system.
While it could easily be a standalone game in the series, clocking in at around eight hours and serving up heaps of Xenomorphs and smart narrative beats, you’ll definitely expect Part Two of the action once all is said and done.
While we don’t know precisely what’s in store, it appears we’ll be getting some much awaited variety outside of Part One’s packs of samey Xenomorphs. Survios says Part Two “continues Zula’s story, pitting her against deadlier enemies and more difficult challenges,” noting that it’s already in development.
First on the docket though is Quest release of Part One, which is slated to arrive exclusively on Quest 3/3S on February 13th, 2025. Fitting all of those dynamically loading levels, detailed textures and physics-based interactions onto Quest 3’s mobile chipset doesn’t sound like an easy task—ostensibly why the studio delayed the Quest release in the first place.
Whatever the case, with core systems is already built for Part One, so we’re hoping for a speedy turnaround for Zula Hendricks’ next (and possibly final) fight to cleanse the rogue science station of every last spitting Xenomorph.
AEXLAB, the studio behind VR shooter Vail (2024), announced it’s opened a crowd-investment campaign to support ongoing development of the game. Additionally, the studio revealed the multiplayer shooter has generated over $5.5 million in revenue to date, owing to its 300,000+ unique players across PC VR and Quest platforms.
Unlike typical crowdfunding campaigns, which promise a product in exchange for startup funds, the Miami, Florida-based studio is pursuing the equity crowd-investment route to fund ongoing support of Vail.
Similar to how Virtuix supported the production of its Omni One VR treadmill in 2023, AEXLAB is seeking individual investors looking to purchase common stock in the company. The studio says on its invest page that it’s now accepting minimum investments of $1,000 from individual investors, noting that its share price is currently $36.52.
Notably, shares in private companies are usually illiquid, meaning there is no ready market to buy and sell them like in public stock exchanges. Recouping on that investment requires one of two major scenarios: the studio is acquired by another company, or the studio launches an initial public offering (IPO), both of which are considered long-term exits; the studio notes in its FAQ that this can typically take “approximately 5-10 years” or longer.
While it’s anyone’s guess just how fast XR will grow, it’s clear AEXLAB is reaching out primarily to individuals who are not only banking on explosive growth in the XR industry in that time frame, but also vetting on the company’s ability to successfully navigate that growth.
“We’ve built something extraordinary with your support, and it’s important to us to give longstanding community members like you the chance to be part of this next chapter,” the studio says. “This is your opportunity to join us as we scale VAIL VR to heights previously only dreamed of.”
How high can Vail go? Since its launch on SteamVR and Quest earlier this year, the game has keyed into a unique free-to-play/paid hybrid model, offering up its Citadel location for free, including 1v1 battles and a playground to test out its various systems and weapons, while selling access to the rest of the game, which includes the full slate of multiplayer modes. By all accounts, it seems to be working.
At the time of this writing, the game currently sits at a [4.8/5] on the Horizon Store for Quest from over 13,000 user reviews, and a ‘Very Positive’ overall user score on Steam from over 2,300 user reviews.
Meta has launched its Quest Holiday Sale, bringing big discounts to some of the platform’s top titles.
From now until January 6th, you’ll be able to grab up to 50% off a large list of Quest games, which also includes savings on apps and DLC. You can check out the whole list over on the Horizon Store.
Meta is also introducing a number of seasonal bundles, also available until January 6th:
The Walking Dead Series: Nothing says the holidays like braining a gaggle of walkers. Use your downtime this season to catch up with The Walking Dead Series. This bundle collects both chapters of Saints & Sinners.
Boxing Day: Who’s ready to rumble? Unwind in the ring with two great games that get the blood pumping and the sweat flowing. Boxing gloves not included.
Sleigh All Day: Team up or survive solo in these VR shooters. Stay frosty!
Deck the Halls, Links, & Lakes: No matter where you find yourself this holiday season, these games will transport you to pure leisure. Enjoy a little fishing or practice your swing on the golf course—and it’s even more fun with friends (wherever they may be).
Rockin’ Around the Tree: Get moving and grooving with these rhythm games. Whether you’re in the mood to dance or go pa-rum-pum-pum-pum, these titles make for both great party games and solo jam sessions.
No Place Like Home: Feeling like you’re stuck in Kansas? These games feature otherworldly experiences with a big change in scenery. Collect and tend to your intergalactic garden or embark on a narrative-driven journey to save the world.
Shake It Like a Snow Globe: Mix it up with these games that’ll get you moving. You’ll be dancing and prancing in Jingle Bell Square in no time. Plus, you can reward yourself with a delicious holiday treat. Might we recommend some egg nog?
Om For the Holidays: This holiday, don’t forget to give yourself a wellness break. It’s been a long year—you’ve earned it. These apps are perfect for getting a little “you” time and some well-deserved relaxation into your daily life.
Alien: Rogue Incursion is the first full-blown VR-native in the storied franchise, serving up hordes of Xenomorphs in an authentically ‘Aliens’ universe. Developed by VR veteran studio Survios (Creed: Rise to Glory, The Walking Dead: Onslaught), Rogue Incursion presents a veritable balancing act of combat and exploration through its dark and gritty cinematic universe, which definitely offers pulse-raising encounters with raptor-like packs of the game’s namesake. It also feels overly encumbered by the sheer repetition of random alien encounters and its equally punishing save system.
Unlike Alien: Isolation (2014), where you’re basically helpless to stealthily sneak by a singular Xenomorph, Rogue Incursion has armed you with numerous weapons, and as a result, has put a slew of more numerous, but decidedly less impactful enemies in your way. Still, it’s a tried and true recipe for the franchise, which you’ll find in everything from Aliens: Colonial Marines (2013) to Aliens: Dark Descent (2023).
Essentially, Rogue Incursion builds pressure by making aliens super powerful and super easy to kill, but also super prevalent. Aliens can kill you with one or two swipes of their claw, but they’re also bullet sponges susceptible to a quarter mag from a pulse rifle or three revolver shots, handily turning them into a pile of acidic goo—which you better not step on.
That said, don’t be fooled by the first few hours of the game, as you easily dispatch baddies with a few casual blasts. What Xenomorphs lack in armor, they make up for in numbers, eventually serving up a fever pitch of rough encounters in the second half of the game that will have you blasting away and reloading like a maniac against a whole pack of X-rays. The lack of variety in enemy types and repetitive encounters do spoil the fun somewhat, as you always know what’s waiting for you around the corner; just not the number of them.
With lots of baddies, you’d expect to find a ton of ammo and health packs too, although the rub is the game’s only two consumables are pretty scarce, which increases pressure to get every shot right—all the while tackling the game’s routine assortment of environmental puzzles, such as rewiring door panels, and fetching keys and accessing terminals for various reason, all of which forces you to keep your head on swivel for incoming baddies lurking behind you. Nowhere but the save points in Panic Rooms dotted throughout levels are truly safe.
Thus far, it’s a winning recipe, especially considering the fit and finish of the game’s environments and enemies, which agilely clatter through the science station’s sieve of ventilation shafts. By straddling the horror and action-adventure genre though, Rogue Incursion presents its own unique set of pros and cons.
It took me a while to really pin down why itwas so good at making me feel anxious—it definitely does the job. After the first few hours, it really started sink in that it wasn’t for the sake of the creepy crawly killing machines, which seemingly slink in from anywhere and can even climb the ceiling above me. It’s what they represent: resource depletion and having to repeat a laundry list of tasks after eventually dying and reappearing at a far-flung manual save point back at the Panic Room. That’s a frustration I wish weren’t a part of the game’s otherwise clever formula.
The lack of automatic saves makes things harder on any difficulty level, which could mean going up an elevator, wiring a door panel, crawling through an access tunnel, hearing a narrative beat from your on-again off-again android companion ‘Davis 01’, running through an entire new section of the game, wiring another door panel, getting ammo, and then being forced to repeat everything upon an untimely death. It sounds exhausting because it is.
My fear of the being ganked by a Xenomorph was gradually replaced by a mental checklist of tasks I had to repeat. It’s an old school philosophy to game development, which I definitely respect, but its one rarely seen in games that put such a heavy emphasis on narrative progression. You’d expect a save point after completing an important task, or right before entering a difficult arena-style fight, but that’s simply not the case.
This comes in stark contrast to the game’s sprawling levels, which offer plenty of opportunities to get extra equipment and learn more about the world through found notes. Traversing the busted station however comes at a price. Should you really explore everywhere to read a ineffectual email about supply requisition, or scavenge a clip of ammo or a health syringe only to expend them instantly when two aliens pop out on your way back to the original fork in the road? Because you can’t ‘clear’ levels, anywhere you go is dangerous, effectively discouraging ancillary exploration.
The constant threat of being tossed back to a far away save point also limits the amount of attention I can pay to the game’s many found notes, which include both audio tapes and written logs on terminals. More on those below.
Immersion
For all of my frustrations with Rogue Incursion, it absolutely smashes the Alien franchise aesthetic out of the park, creating a foreboding atmosphere across its massive levels, which notably load dynamically for an unbroken gaming experience. You won’t be sitting around waiting in loading screens beyond the initial boot-up process.
Image courtesy Survios
And the level of detail is amazing—even on my below min-spec PC gaming rig. Packing a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 and aging Intel Core i7-6700K CPU, I was able to play on medium settings with no real hiccups when using my Quest 3 via Meta’s PC Link.
Another high point is the game’s narrative, which offers a few exciting twists that I won’t reveal here, and a difficult battle that caps off the game, which takes around eight hours to beat—eventual level setbacks included.
Marring some of this, the game has a bit of jank when it comes to its physics-based object interactions. Weapons work well, although I always found myself ineffectually grabbing levers and fumbling the game’s inventory system, which is split between body-worn stuff, like grenades, guns and ammo, and a quick select inventory, brought up with a button push, for tools like a blow torch, wire clamp, my tablet and access key card.
Inventory and interaction systems can feel just a little too cumbersome to be truly friction-free though. The most frustrating was how object placement was too loosely tied to your body’s actual position. In any mode, standing, seated in fixed position, or swivel chair, I was always second guessing my gear’s actual position, leaving me to scramble for a bit of ammo I thought was at my hip, but had shifted somehow to be in front of me, requiring me to constantly look down and fumble for it, or periodically recalibrate my position in the menu in hopes it would fix things temporarily. In the end, I had to do a lot of looking down to find my gear, which left me at a disadvantage.
Realism in shooting and reloading is high, which is a double-sided sword when it comes to immersion. You have to delicately reload shell-by-shell on both the revolver and shotgun, which takes 10-15 seconds. I admire the game’s realism here, but wish there was a suitably sci-fi excuse why I might be able to load all of my shells at the same time for quicker reactions.
Sadly, one of the least useful bits of kit in the game is invariably the series’ classic movement radar, as it’s both a massive thing that clatters against everything, and is essentially useless since a sound effect always precedes an alien’s appearance. Both the shotgun and pulse rifle are better operated with two hands, so I tended to keep an ear out for skittering X-rays instead of awkwardly shifting between weapons.
Comfort
With only few exceptions, Alien: Rogue Incursion is a very comfortable game. There are brief moments of forced locomotion that could be uncomfortable for some, namely when Xenomorphs grab and eat you, but they’re well vignetted. You won’t find rollercoaster rides, or anything else (besides the togglable camera shake) that might send you reeling.
It also features all standard comfort options (excluding teleportation), including smooth and variable snap-turn, variable strength movement vignettes, and both standing and two seating options (fixed and swivel).
Alien: Rogue Incursion’ Comfort Settings – December 18th, 2024
Turning
Artificial turning
Snap-turn
Quick-turn
Smooth-turn
Movement
Artificial movement
Teleport-move
Dash-move
Smooth-move
Blinders
Head-based
Controller-based
Swappable movement hand
Posture
Standing mode
Seated mode
Artificial crouch
Real crouch
Accessibility
Subtitles
Languages
English, French, Italian, German, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese – Brazil, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Spanish – Latin America, Traditional Chinese
Although Android XR isn’t properly open-source for the time being, Google hopes the OS will run on multiple partner headsets. While Samsung is said to be the first to launch an Android XR headset, Sony, Lynx, and XREAL are also planning to use the operating system.
According to Google, Sony, Lynx, and XREAL are on board with Android XR.
Sony SRH-S1 MR headset | Image courtesy Sony
For Sony’s part, its SRH-S1 enterprise-focused MR headset is very likely the first target for Android XR. When we went hands-on with the headset earlier this year, the company was tight-lipped about whether it was building its own platform and where users could source content from. Android XR makes a lot more sense for the company than trying to build out its own XR OS and platform.
As for Sony’s current and future PSVR headsets, we expect they’ll continue to be tied directly to the PlayStation OS rather than switch to Android XR.
Lynx R-1 MR headset | Image courtesy Lynx
Lynx R-1 is a long-in-development MR headset that has struggled to make it fully to market. Part of that struggle, naturally, is building out a software stack that does everything an XR headset needs to do.
Lynx founder Stan Larroque tells Road to VR the R-1 won’t adopt Android XR, but future headsets from the company will. Making this move could well put the company in a better position for the future, by reducing software development costs and giving its headsets access to a larger ecosystem of apps and content.
XREAL Air 2 Ultra AR Glasses | Image courtesy XREAL
As for XREAL—a company building AR glasses primarily made to provide a large floating screen that projects content from other devices—it’s not clear yet exactly how they will use Android XR. But a good bet is that it will be the basis for future devices from the company.
While both Meta and Google are open to allowing their XR OS to work on third-party headsets, they’re still the gatekeepers. Neither Horizon OS nor Android XR are actually ‘open’ at this point. Only hand-picked partners can build on either OS.
But now that both operating systems are in play, there’s increased pressure for both to strive to be the ‘more open’ of the two. That pressure could quickly lead one or both companies to make their XR OS properly open for anyone to use.
Blackmagic Design has revealed full specs and details for its new URSA Cine Immersive camera, specially designed to shoot 8K VR180 footage for the Apple Immersive Video format. Pre-orders for the $30,000 camera are open now, with shipping planned for Q1 2025. A forthcoming update to DaVinci Resolve Studio (also made by Blackmagic) adds editing tools specifically for Apple Immersive Video, including support for calibration data from the camera.
Apple Immersive Video is a 180° 3D video format intended for playback on Apple Vision Pro. Early versions of Blackmagic’s URSA Cine Immersive are likely the cameras used to film Apple Immersive Video content currently available on the headset.
Now the camera is being made available commercially, with pre-orders available for a cool $30,000. Though certainly expensive, this is in-line with many other high-end cinema cameras.
The URSA Cine Immersive is specially made to capture Apple Immersive Video, featuring a pair of 180° stereo lenses, capturing 59MP (8,160 x 7,200) each, with 16 stops of dynamic range. The camera can shoot up to 90 FPS in the Blackmagic RAW format, which also embeds calibration data (unique to each camera) that’s carried into the editing process for more precise and stable footage.
1 of 3
Image courtesy Black Magic Design
Image courtesy Black Magic Design
Image courtesy Black Magic Design
The forthcoming update to the DaVinci Resolve Studio editing software will include features specific to editing footage from the camera:
Immersive Video Viewer: Pan, tilt, and roll clips on 2D monitors or directly on Apple Vision Pro
Seamless Transitions: Clean master files using metadata-based bypass for Apple Vision Pro transitions
Export Presets: Streamlined delivery to Apple Vision Pro-ready packages
Both Blackmagic and Apple hope the release of the camera and streamlined editing workflow will make it easier for filmmakers to capture and release content in the Apple Immersive Video format.
It’s unclear if the camera and editor will work equally well for capturing VR180 footage for playback on other platforms and headsets, or if there’s something proprietary to the Apple Immersive Video format that would prevent straightforward compatibility and multi-platform releases.
Meta has publicly stated that it wants to be “the Android of XR.” But you know who else wants to be the Android of XR? Android XR, of course.
Beyond debates about specs or features, one major factor is likely to determine whether Meta can fend off growing pressure from Google and Apple in the XR landscape: flat apps.
Flat apps—like Spotify, TikTok, Snapchat, and Discord—aren’t the most exciting use case for a headset. But Vision Pro (which supports a massive library of flat iPadOS apps) has shown just how much value is added by fusing the XR experience with the apps we already know and love (rather than completely separating us from them when we put on a headset). And now Android XR is making the same play by supporting all existing Android apps on the Play Store.
While Meta’s headsets excel in gaming, it’s clear that XR’s potential extends far beyond gaming alone.
A company focused solely on gaming (like Nintendo) will never reach the scale of a company building a broader computing platform (like Microsoft). That’s why Microsoft is worth 43 times as much as Nintendo. Admittedly, this isn’t a perfect comparison (as Microsoft does much more than just build a computing platform), but hopefully the analogy is clear.
So between Meta and Google, we have two XR platforms:
Meta’s Horizon OS has the largest and best library of immersive apps.
Google’s Android XR has the largest and best library of flat apps.
To dominate XR, both need what the other has. But who faces a bigger challenge?
Meta, it seems, is in a tougher spot.
Immersive app developers are hungry for growth. If a popular game can gain 25% more users by porting to Android XR, the decision if obvious.
By contrast, major flat apps (like Spotify, TikTok, Snapchat, and Discord) stand to gain relatively little growth from porting to Horizon OS. They’d be lucky to gain even 0.25% more users than they already have on the entirety of Android.
And you might be thinking, “Horizon OS is based on Android, so porting apps should be easy!” That’s true—the technical side of porting may be relatively simple. But for massive apps with huge userbases and constant updates, the real challenge is in the ongoing support and maintenance, which is no small commitment.
As a result, Google is better positioned to attract key immersive apps to Android XR than Meta is to bring critical flat apps to Horizon OS. Without a critical mass of flat apps, Meta’s headset risk being relegated as immersive gaming consoles rather than general computing devices.
You may not find flat apps to be an essential part of the XR experience, but there’s no doubt that if one platform has both key flat apps and key immersive apps, it will beat out the platform that has only one or the other.
Even if Meta makes better hardware (let’s say they just consistently make headsets that are 20% faster, lighter, and cheaper than the equivalent Android XR headset), I still don’t think that will matter in the long run, compared to whether or not they have core flat apps available on their platform.
This is an existential risk to Meta’s XR ambitions, and one that doesn’t have any obvious solutions.
Meta Quest developers looking to port their Unity-based apps to Google’s newly unveiled Android XR operating system shouldn’t have a tough time of it, Unity says, as the game engine creator today released all of the tools devs need to get cracking.
Google unveiled its Android XR operating system today, which is coming first to the newly revealed Samsung mixed reality headset, “Project Moohan,” slated for consumer release in 2025. The short of it: details are still very thin, although Samsung’s prototype feels like a mashup of Quest and Apple Vision Pro, which you can read more about in our hands-on.
And Unity, maker of the most popular game engine for XR app developers, announced they’ve partnered with Google to provide official platform support for Android XR. So, starting today, app developers can both build as well as port existing games and experiences to upcoming Android XR devices.
Samsung Project Moohan | Image courtesy Google
Developers opted into the Public Experimental release of Unity 6, which is available for all versions, can start now, which includes dedicated documentation and optimizations to help create performant and comfortable experiences, Unity says.
Unity’s XR tools also feature support for a list of modern features, including hand and eye-tracking, occlusion, foveated rendering, composition layers, and more features designed to make it “easy to start fresh or expand your audience by bringing existing apps and games to Android XR,” the company says.
Apps that already integrate OpenXR will ostensibly be the easiest to port, with Unity citing studios like Owlchemy Labs and Resolution Games, which have brought their Unity apps to Android XR with “minimal effort,” the company says.
“This is as simple a port as you’re ever going to encounter. Plus, it’s not going to break your four-person studio—or your 400-person studio—to make it happen,” says Owlchemy Labs CEO Andrew Eiche.
For now, Google has only shown off Android XR working on Samsung’s prototype in addition to a pair of prototype smartglasses we got to try on (re: not AR), although it and Unity making porting easy for Quest developers feels like a strong opening gambit.
While Android is generally known for its broad device support, it’s likely the company will need to keep a fairly short leash on the sort of devices it hopes to support with Android XR though. Granted, it’s the earliest of early days for Android XR—we don’t even know the specs, price, release date, name, etc for Samsung’s headset.
Still, Google ostensibly has its sights on capturing a substantial slice of the XR market in the coming years. Notably, in addition to VR content, Android XR supports the entire existing library of standard Android apps as well as “spatialized” versions of those apps, undoubtedly positioning Google as a “day-1” player in the XR space, and competitor apparent to both Meta’s Quest platform and Apple Vision Pro.
– – — – –
We’re still learning about Android XR; we haven’t heard whether other major game engines, like Epic’s Unreal Engine, are offering similar support. It is however a good bet though, considering Unreal Engine has supported OpenXR for a number of years now. Road to VR will of course be following all things Android XR, so make sure to check back soon for more.
